|
(In Regard of the Return of the Divorced
Woman of the Mouwahidoun Druze)
The Mouwahidoun Druze considered
the Almighty saying,
“A divorce is
only Permissible twice”,
is only but a training procedure adopted for a new society throughout
its phase of preparation until it could practice freedom with full
responsibility. Divorce could also be final and irrevocable in accordance with
the detailed verses mentioned in
Women sura,
for the Almighty says,
“Men are the
protectors And maintainers of women, Because God has given The one more
(strength) Than the other, and because They support them From their means
Therefore the righteous women Are devoutly obedient, and guard In (the
husband’s) absence What God would have them guard. As to those women On whose
part ye fear Disloyalty and ill-conduct, Admonish them (first), (Next), refuse
to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); But if they return to
obedience, Seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For God is Most High,
Great (above you all).”
The Almighty said in his Holy
Qur’an,
“As to those women On whose part ye fear Disloyalty and ill-conduct, Admonish
them (first),” is just a
means to overcome the problem through preaching, an attitude of kindness and
mercy; however, if this did not work, then
“refuse to share
their beds,” an
explicit warning to abandon them; yet, if both did not work, then a tougher
attitude is required only if methods of preaching, rebuke and abandonment did
not work,
“(And last) beat
them (lightly); But if they return to obedience, Seek not against them Means (of
annoyance).” This is all
that could be done within the one family regarding the
handling of husband in case the women did not guard what God wants them
to in their husbands’ absence.
Shall the
home familial procedure failed to settle the disagreement, the
interference of arbiters from both families shall be sought until a final
solution is achieved without violating the sanctity of marriage, the solemnity
of legislation or the dignity of man.
“If ye fear a
breach Between them twain, Appoint (two) arbiters, One from his family, And the
other from hers; If they wish for peace, God will cause Their reconciliation:
For God hath full knowledge, And is acquainted With all things.”
(Women
sura -verse 35)
Ibn Kathir mentions in his
interpretations of the scholars’ sayings: If disagreement taking place between
husband and wife lasted for so long, and has become so complicated, then the
judge shall seek someone reliable from his family and another from her family to
meet, consider and the issue for the benefit of either separation or
reconciliation.
Of course, the good offices of both
arbiters – under the supervision of the legal judge – would be prompt, serious
and sincere for reconciliation and returning the marital life back to normal.
In the Almighty’s saying,
“If they wish
for peace God will cause Their reconciliation,”
the word,
“they”
refer to arbiters
and
“Their”
refers to the reconciliation between husband and wife, so they live in intimacy
and harmony again.
Shall we know that the will of both
arbiters is that of peace, it is imposed as a condition that the failure of
those arbiters to reconcile between husband and wife shall not impose their
endeavors for peace, it shall rather emphasize that if there has been a way to
achieve peace along with their good offices, God would have caused
reconciliation between husband and wife; otherwise, what could the
divine assertion
“If they wish
for peace God will cause Their reconciliation,”
make sense. However, the existence of the causes of disagreement which started
with the wife’s disloyalty and ill-conduct until it reached the arbiters
interference and undertaking the responsibility of settling this issue along
with the consideration of the husband and wife opinion, and in the auspices of
the legal judge,
made the scholars of Tawheed come to a conclusion that the final irrevocable
marriage shall take place at the legal competence in charge of managing the
affairs of the Mouwahidoun.
All this shall be
subsequent to the gradual stages adopted to settle the marital disagreement; to
the emphasis that reconciliation could not be achieved, despite the will for
peace; and to the period given to reach the decisive resolution.
Shall the decisive
resolution be reached, the return of the divorced woman would not be for the
favor of her marital life security. Consequently, when the man asks his woman to
return to her marital house, for any reason agreed upon, is but a messing to the
issues of life, and does not help in building a good family which constitutes
the core of a virtuous society.
The Personal Status Law of the
Druze Sect in articles (47-48-49) stipulates the following:
Article (47):
If a disagreement or dissension between husband and wife took place and one of
the two parties referred to a judge, the judge assigns an arbiter from the
husband’s family and another from the wife’s family; however, if none of their
families enjoy the capacities of an arbiter, then the judge would choose another
not from their families.
Article (48):
Both arbiters shall know the reasons behind the husband and wife dissension and
shall exert great efforts to settle the same; if reconciliation was impossible
and
negligence and persistence was from the part of the husband, the judge
shall separate them and pronounce a judgment that gives the wife the right of
her entire or partial deferred dowry; however, if the same was from the wife’s
part, the judge shall pronounce the renunciation of all or part of the deferred
dowry and the judge shall pronounce, in both cases, that the righteous of
husband or wife shall bind the other with the indemnities imposed.
Article (49):
Shall the judge find that the divorce is legally unjustified, he pronounces a
judgment giving the wife the right of binding her husband with the indemnities
imposed in addition to the deferred dowry provided that he considers the
moral
and material indemnities.
As to article (42) of the same law,
it has to be discussed particularly.
Issued by the bureau of
Mashyakhat Al-Akl
of the Mouwahidoun Druze sect
|